Grizzly Man… I am not sure how to even express my thoughts on this. This was the second time I saw the movie, and not only did I not notice any deeper meaning to the film (besides what I had at first glance), I was just increasingly irritated. In my opinion the movie itself has a fantastic premise, and I love how it is a topic that not many have explored. Unfortunately, the main character/narrator of Timothy… Is nothing more than that. To me, his portrayal in the movie is just downright strange, to the point where it takes away from some of the wonder that could have been provoked in the film. His irrational actions, senseless commentary, and overall demeanor just ruin the film for me. I agree that the point of the film is not to be a nature film and not meant to express the wonders of the Grizzlies, but the story of Timothy is just a sad tale.
On that note, reading the quote of whether Timothy got what he deserved… I definitely say he did. There comes a point where a director cannot expect to provoke sympathy by focusing on the failings of the film’s character. When dealing with something as dangerous as Grizzly bears, which is pointed out in the film no less, you have to wonder how Timothy did not get killed earlier. While Timothy did end up “succeeding” in his quest to “be a bear”, he did so (hopefully) realizing that the cost would be his life.
Though, I can’t make this wholly negative. The main aspect of the movie I enjoyed, for the second time as well, was how the film is a great example of good usage of raw films. Ignoring the presence of Timothy, I was able to thoroughly enjoy the raw, seemingly uncut footage of the Grizzlies in their natural habitat. Though understandably not the focus of the film, I just was unable to connect with Timothy and his plight at all, so this served as a useful subplot for myself.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I'm not entirely sure what frustrates you most about the film, Miheer -- Timothy himself or Herzog, the director. Perhaps you're not sure! One thing to consider about both of them, however, is the question of the purpose of their (or any) films. Herzog, especially, typically likes to prick the viewer in his films. Perhaps, in other words, it's ok to be made uncomfortable -- even irritated -- by a film. This film is most assuredly not satisfying in the way that a good action movie, or a Ken Burns documentary, is; but if we're to believe Godmilow, that's quite the compliment for Herzog (and Timothy).
ReplyDelete