I think that the use of the interrotron is a very interesting concept. As with most inventions, I can see it must have ups and downs. As a viewer, it was nice that McNamara had eye contact with his audience. It made his responses and stories seem much more like conversations which kept my interest. I can see how terrible awkward it must have been for him to have to speak to a screen with a face on it asking questions. I know that if I were faced with that kind of interview I would be very uncomfortable. But it was obviously effective as they got more than enough interview time to make the whole film. I suppose the use of the device would have to vary according to the person being interviewed and the topic.
I think the rule to answer the questions you wished had been asked it a good political tactic. This allows the interviewee to be in charge of the conversation. This causes that person to appear strong and capable. Although, this can at times make the person appear foolish. But just like everything in politics, it is all in the way you can spin something. A truly good speaker can get away with this tactic and be very successful with it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Again, Shannon, I'd say I can't disagree that the 'don't-answer-the-question' tactic has its obvious uses, but I think the next question is: is it morally ok to not answer people's questions as a rule -- particularly when, in theory, you are acting on their behalf?
ReplyDelete